The way it works now is compatible with WW1.x > -----Original Message----- > From: BOGAERT Mathias [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 4:12 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [OS-webwork] DefaultWorkflowInterceptor > > > Hi, > > The DefaultWorkflowInterceptor doesn't make a distinction > between field errors and action errors when returning a value. > > I propose that whenever an action error is present, > Action.ERROR is returned, and whenever a field error is > present, Action.INPUT is returned. Action errors are checked > first. This way people can map ERROR to a global error page. > > Thoughts? > > Mathias > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. > Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign > up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the > bash shell to sys admin. Click now! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371> &op=click > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork >
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78&alloc_id371&op=click _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
