There is a blub about what they all are, but not a lot about how their order is important.
Perhaps a little more "emphasis" could be put into -->
i.e. How does one setup up their interceptors if they want field value errors to be raised, but still want to execute their action vs.
returning directly to "INPUT"
I think this needs to be documented a little more thoroughly.
The overview of interceptors in good.
Perhaps a "common interceptor setups"/walk through link would be helpful.
I have it setup the way I want for my project, but I fumbled around through the wiki and mailing list until I got it the way I wanted.
As far as WW 2.1, do you feel it will include the ability to set your field validation at method level?
Any decisions regarding the syntax?
<!DOCTYPE validators PUBLIC "-//OpenSymphony Group//XWork Validator 1.0//EN"
"http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.dtd">
<validators>
<!-- Applies to all actions -->
<field name="definition.name" >
<field-validator type="requiredstring">
<message>Definition name is required. You entered "${definition.name}".</message>
</field-validator>
</field>
<field name="definition.className">
<field-validator type="requiredstring">
<message>Class name is required. You entered "${definition.className}".</message>
</field-validator>
</field>
<!-- Applies only action/method delete -->
<method name="delete">
<field name="definition.name" >
<field-validator type="requiredstring">
<message>Definition name is required. You entered "${definition.name}".</message>
</field-validator>
</field>
.................
</method>
</validators>
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 16:17, Jason Carreira wrote:
It's due in the next week or so... We have 8 issues still open to fix or move to 2.1 > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 4:11 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [OS-webwork] WebWork2 > > > I was just wondering if there is a estimated time of release for > WebWork2 Final. Also, are you going from Beta2 to another Beta, > RC1, or straight to Final. > > Thanks. > -- > Gregg Bolinger > www.embeddedthought.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, > CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
|
-- Matthew Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
