I believe that is just a warning -- but to avoid it, just implement NoParameters
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Donnerstag, Juergen Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 8:22 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: AW: [OS-webwork] RE: Script Action And how to avoid CompoundRoot Access error? Object does not exist? -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Jason Carreira Gesendet: Mittwoch, 4. Februar 2004 00:03 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: RE: [OS-webwork] RE: Script Action You can just access the Parameter map from ActionContext... > -----Original Message----- > From: Donnerstag, Juergen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 1:54 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: AW: [OS-webwork] RE: Script Action > > > > Using BSF I created a ScriptAction class that calls the > script during ActionSupport.execute(). But there open issues. > What about Objects to be accessed (get/set) by a Form. Action > class would need to support some generic getter/setter > methods in order to modify the according script variable. > Maybe something like > > class ScriptAction ... implements GenericGetterSetter { > public String getValue(String name); > public void setValue(String name, String value); > } > > Does Webwork/Xwork already support something similiar to the > GenericGetterSetter interface or anything similiar to the > generic getter/setter methods? > > regards > Juergen > > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Auftrag von Jason Carreira > Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. Februar 2004 16:59 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: RE: [OS-webwork] RE: Script Action > > > It should be relatively easy, for someone who uses a > scripting environment and knows how to tell it to execute a > script, to make something like this possible: > > <action name="createRole" class="com....BeanShellScriptAction"> > <param name="script">scripts/CreateRoleAction.bsh</param> > <result name="input" type="dispatcher"> > <param name="location">/useradmin/createRole.ftl</param> > </result> > <interceptor-ref name="defaultStack"/> > </action> > > I'm not sure about having one generic SriptAction, maybe one > per script type... > > Jason > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Donnerstag, Juergen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 1:54 AM > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Subject: [OS-webwork] RE: Script Action > > > > > > I was thinking of using scripts instead of classes for rapid > > development. I'm pretty sure I'll need java classes for > > production later on. But for development I'd like to use > > scripts. This is why the difference should be minimal only. > > Groovy and BeanShell are both very much like Java. > > I think OFBiz is using JPublish as well. It looks very nice, > > but would require a major change in our current enviroment. > > > > Below you see an example of how I'm doing it currently. > > > > <action name="createRole" > > class="org.hibernate.admin.action.CreateRoleAction"> > > <result name="input" type="dispatcher"> > > <param > > name="location">/useradmin/createRole.ftl</param> > > </result> > > <interceptor-ref name="defaultStack"/> > > </action> > > > > For development I'd like something like > > <action name="createRole" > > script="scripts/CreateRoleAction.bsh"> > > <result name="input" type="dispatcher"> > > <param > > name="location">/useradmin/createRole.ftl</param> > > </result> > > <interceptor-ref name="defaultStack"/> > > </action> > > > > or maybe > > <action name="createRole" class="com....ScriptAction" > > param="scripts/CreateRoleAction.bsh"> > > <result name="input" type="dispatcher"> > > <param > > name="location">/useradmin/createRole.ftl</param> > > </result> > > <interceptor-ref name="defaultStack"/> > > </action> > > > > regards > > Juergen > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: remigijus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Re: Script Action > > 2004-02-02 11:58 > > Regarding of script usage in Action there is another > > interesting new commer groovy and groovlet. I think it would > > be very interesting to use groovy for actions and groovlets > > instead of JSP and velocity. I also think it can be much > > better to use groovy ant groovlet for templates it definatly > > will be much faster as velocity which now is used as > > default. I had a chat with some guys who is working on > > groovlets and they are going to to somthing to make it work > > together with webwork2. Does anyone have some opinion about it. > > > > Remis > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Kris Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 9:28 PM > > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Script Action > > > > > > Thanks. I was aware of JPublish using scripting but I also > > heard (but I'm not certain if this is true) that JPublish > > uses XWork in it. If that is true and maybe this is what > > you are referring to, do you use BeanShell as your Action > > classes in XWork? > > > > Kris > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Eden > > Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 11:18 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Script Action > > > > Kris, > > > > I do it for all of my webapps now, using the script support > > in JPublish. I use BeanShell these days as my scripting > > language of choice > > > > due to its similarity to Java. Works like a charm. > > > > -Anthony > > > > Kris Thompson wrote: > > > > >I haven't heard of those three you mentioned but this has > > been out for >awhile. > > http://www.artima.com/forums/flat.jsp?forum=> 121&thread=6087 > > > > > > > >There they used JavaScript as their > > classes. Sounds cool but I haven't >really heard of others > > doing this. XWork is a great platform to use >these tools > > since it is not dependant on the servlet API. I would very > > >much be interested in hearing about others having used > > scripting >languages has their action classes. > >Kris > > Thompson > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of > > >Donnerstag, Juergen > > >Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 4:59 AM > > >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > >Subject: [OS-webwork] Script Action > > > > > >Hi, > > > > > >I'm using xwork/webwork2 and would like to use scripted > > actions (BSF, >jpython, groovy, ...) instead of Java > > classes. Does anybody know how to >do it? I checked the > > docs, lists and wikis but did not find any >information. > > > >Help is very much appreciated. >Juergen > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, > > CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
