> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Vedovato Paolo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 9:43 AM > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] WW1.3 Memory Consumption > > > BTW: since I'm into profiling: > > I saw that ValueStack$MethodInfo came in in WW1.4. > > It's a big (!) memory holder which never gets GC'ed... > > Overall it seems to me that WW1.4 uses a lot more memory than > > 1.3... > > >
I do not think MethodInfo takes much more memory than it did in WW1.3. The only difference is that in WW1.3 the cache only contained Method objects so they do not show up in your profiling chart. There are also other static caches for example in BeanUtil that you do not see because they cache objects from the java packages. It would be nice to be able to see objects that are being held by Webwork classes, regardless of the object's own class. That would produce a more correct and useful profiling report. Cheers, Dick Zetterberg ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
