Ok it sounds nice, I'm not against velocity, I'm just curious. How many hits you are getting per day and peak load? What hardware and software do you use? Did you tryed to look at Freemarker, how can you compare Freemarker vs Velocity.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rickard Öberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 11:11 AM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Velocity vs. JSP > Eric Webb wrote: > > Since moving to web application frameworks (jakarta turbine and ww2) > > I've exclusively used velocity. I find velocity's syntax to be simple, > > clean, and sufficently powerful for constructing views. I mean, when > > you get down to it, a view is simply html (in most cases), and velocity > > does it nicely. Custom macros and the #parse() marco allow me to create > > modular .vm files that can be reused many many times. > <snip> > > Ditto that. We've built our CMS/Portal product to use WW/Velocity > exclusively, and we're VERY happy with that. The major pro's we've seen are: > 1) Clean syntax > 2) Great performance > 3) Templates does not have to be in files (JSP files do) > > All in all, much recommended. > > /Rickard > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. > Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with > a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id56&alloc_id438&op=click _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
