Well, you could just register your own ConfigurationProvider... That's been in there for like 8 or 10 months :-)
This is more for the case where you want to have control of object creation, for instance if you want to initialize your Actions and Interceptors from an IoC container... > -----Original Message----- > From: Matthew Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 10:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] ObjectFactory > > > Would this be of interest of someone wanted populate their > actions from the database instead of the xwork.xml ? We have > toying around with the idea of user customized actions, but > weren't sure if xwork would be a candidate for this. > > thanks, > > Matt > > > On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 02:40, Jason Carreira wrote: > > I've implemented an ObjectFactory in CVS head in XWork and > WebWork... > > The method signatures may still evolve a bit, especially the errors > > thrown, but it should be a good place to start... People looking to > > integrate IoC containers, this should make things easier. > Looking for > > feedback... > > > > Jason > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. > Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with > a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438> &op=click > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id56&alloc_id438&op=click _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
