On Friday 11 July 2008 02:00:02 Tim Brown wrote: > On Thursday 10 July 2008 09:12:15 Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote: > > In fact, isn't the code broken anyway? There should be an > > error when trying to set a second ID. Seems OpenVAS will simply accept > > it and through away the previous. > > I don't know.... what is the defined behavior of calling script_id twice? > The old code base enforced no conventions. I wouldn't be a drama to fail > the second call (for script_oid also) but such behavior *should* be > documented. I can change this, but other than that are you happy for me to > commit this?
Did anyone have a view on this, or shall I just make a judgement. I want to commit this patch ASAP so I can get cracking on script_oid based dependencies. Cheers, Tim -- Tim Brown <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.nth-dimension.org.uk/> _______________________________________________ Openvas-devel mailing list Openvas-devel@wald.intevation.org http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-devel
