Better late than never - I raised this request almost 3 months ago ;). I'll forward on the port assignment as soon as I get it. It does however raise an interesting question. Which services, openvasd or the manager being written by Matt should we give it to? I did have a thought that maybe we could change openvasd to use a UNIX socket instead and thereby get some much needed privilege separation?
Cheers, Tim ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: [IANA #199362] Application for port-number: otp (Assigned-9390) Date: Wednesday 24 December 2008 From: "Pearl Liang via RT" <iana-po...@iana.org> To: t...@openvas.org Dear Tim Brown: We have assigned the following TCP port to 'otp' with you as the point of contact: otp 9390/tcp OpenVAS Transfer Protocol # Tim Brown <timb&openvas.org> 24 December 2008 See: http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers Please notify IANA if there is any change in contact information by completing the following template: http://www.iana.org/cgi-bin/mod_portno.pl This ticket [IANA #199362] is considered resolved. Best regards, Pearl Liang IANA *************************************************************** Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330 Marina del Rey, California 90292 Voice: (310) 823-9358 FAX: (310) 823-8649 email: iana-po...@iana.org *************************************************************** ------------------------------------------------------- -- Tim Brown <mailto:t...@openvas.org> <http://www.openvas.org/> -- Tim Brown <mailto:t...@nth-dimension.org.uk> <http://www.nth-dimension.org.uk/> _______________________________________________ Openvas-devel mailing list Openvas-devel@wald.intevation.org http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-devel
