On Tuesday 14 July 2009 18:34:30 Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote: > I've assembled the minutes of the OpenVAS DevCon2 session > on library consolidation directly into a change request. > It has been review by the participants of that session. > > http://www.openvas.org/openvas-cr-38.html > > Please let us know what you think about it. > It is not ultimately urgent. But a decision on this > could clear some minds up on future architecture. > > All the best and thanks to the session team (Matt, > Michael, Felix and Tobias).
Great, I was waiting for this to come through so that I could comment. Was there any discussion about that the various libraries should be known as on the filesystem? The reason I ask is that for example, libstring might be a bit generic. Maybe libopenvas-<module> or something? +1 to the concept though, it should make life much easier. Tim -- Tim Brown <mailto:t...@nth-dimension.org.uk> <http://www.nth-dimension.org.uk/> _______________________________________________ Openvas-devel mailing list Openvas-devel@wald.intevation.org http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-devel
