Am 01.11.2012 17:57, schrieb Scott Damron: > I find it ironic that he is unwilling to use source packages
because you may lack understand how RPM works > is using a beta quality Operating System. Fedora is not production > quality, for servers or workstations. so many people telling me this bullshit since many years proven by 8 dist-upgrades with not more downtime as for a normal kernel update on more than 20 production systems and in suammy some hundret of fedora dist-upgrades, building and deploy any server-related software since many years by myself this shows only lack of wualification and lazyiness > I can't see why he isn't running RHEL...or is it just a lot of > hot air? because for PHP 5.4, MySQL 5.6, Postfix 2.9, dbmail 3.0, ffmpeg 1.0 you have to replace half of the distribution which is not so easy due dependencies and finally you end in a mess YOU may not care in recent software we do - because we are developing any web-driven software and any admin-backend running on top of our infrastructure inhouse and using new features heavily since this works for any other software OpenVAS will not be the reason to change anything in the software-cycles especially since any server here has and older install base as OpenVAS existed at all
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openvas-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
