+1, about removing from description. removing because redundant with CVSS, why not once all NVTs have CVSS, but CVSS= 0 (risk_factor: none) will be specify in plugins ? or no CVSS will be specify in this case.
BR. Le 10/18/2011 21:15, Jan-Oliver Wagner a écrit : > Hello, > > since we have consistent tag risk_factor now for all NVTs, > would it make sense to think about removing the text > element "Risk factor: xxx" from all of the description texts. > > It is redundant information and would shorten Reports documents, > especially the very large ones. > > To be honest, I think the risk factor is eventually redundant > anyway once we have all NVTs equipped with a CVSS. > > Not sure what about old OpenVAS-Client. Is it relevant here > to have the risk factor in the textual description? > > Any opinions? > > Best > > Jan > -- | Sébastien AUCOUTURIER | Software Design Engineer Lead | | ITrust | 55 rue l'Occitane BP 67303 31673 LABEGE CEDEX | Email: [email protected] | Fixe Sdt. 05.67.34.67.80 | Fax. 09.80.08.37.23 | IT Security Services & SaaS Editor | _______________________________________________ Openvas-plugins mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-plugins
