Mike Auty <m.a...@softhome.net> said: > Hi James, > First off, great program, it's really amazing what you and the > other developers have achieved. > Secondly the new 2.0 seems to be working out quite well, but I ran > into a little difficulty. The problem I was having turned out to be a > firewall misconfiguration (read something I should have checked at the > beginning, hehe), but whilst I was trying to debug a connection that > just wouldn't work I found it very difficult in the server logs to > differentiate messages from one connected client and another. > I'm guessing this is just a hangover from openvpn 1 having been > single connection only, but it would be really helpful to have some kind > of identifier that ties all the log messages relating to a particular > connection (and I guess one for messages that haven't been associated > with a particular connection yet).
Yes, that's a good point. I did add the client common name to the connection initiated and connection restarted/exited messages, but ideally one would want all messages to have some kind of client prefix, that would probably consist of the SSL/TLS common name + IP address. > Anyway, thanks again for a fantastic piece of software, I look > forward to trying out the future versions as soon as they get released! > Mike 5:) Excellent... take care. James
