On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Ian D. Bjorhovde wrote:

> Has anyone tried using miniLZO instead of the full-blown LZO library?
> I'm looking to build openvpn for the Sveasoft firmware on Linksys
> WRT54G, but don't want the relatively large (216kb) library.
> 
> If what I'm reading is correct, moving to lzo1x_1_compress is
> only slightly slower than lzo1x_1_15_compress (~1.5%), and that
> would be the only disadvantage...

What if you statically link with the full LZO library?  One would think
that would only bring in a subset of the whole library.

James


Reply via email to