Hi, On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 08:28:42PM +0100, Ed W wrote: > Hi, given the new abstractions to support PolarSSL, what > interest/resistance would there be to supporting libsodium? > https://github.com/jedisct1/libsodium
It took us quite some effort to reach the point where a polarssl-compiled
openvpn would be able to talk to a (default-configured) openssl-openvpn,
and I don't really see us using a crypto library that has none of the
algorithms that we need for interoperability.
But then, I'm not the crypto geek here, I'm just the janitor...
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
pgprTqgCq4CPA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
