Anno domini 2020 Gert Doering scripsit:
Hi,
> reading this more closely at merging/testing time, I do have a change
> request...
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 08:49:44PM +0200, Maximilian Wilhelm wrote:
> > +#ifdef TARGET_LINUX
> > + else if (streq (p[0], "bind-dev") && p[1])
> > + {
> > + VERIFY_PERMISSION (OPT_P_SOCKFLAGS);
> > + options->bind_dev = p[1];
> > + }
> > +#endif
>
> One could argue whether the argument should be changed for IFNAMSIZ here
> (so we can error-out right away if it's too long). But this is just
> something to consider.
That might be a bad idea as of upcoming altnames, see
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=7a56493f0620cc1b4cffc9bc59289fdefe76b5f3
> > --- a/src/openvpn/socket.c
> > +++ b/src/openvpn/socket.c
> > @@ -1138,6 +1138,14 @@ create_socket(struct link_socket *sock, struct
> > addrinfo *addr)
> > /* set socket to --mark packets with given value */
> > socket_set_mark(sock->sd, sock->mark);
> >
> > +#if defined(TARGET_LINUX)
> > + if (sock->bind_dev)
> > + {
> > + msg (M_INFO, "Using bind-dev %s", sock->bind_dev);
> > + setsockopt (sock->sd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_BINDTODEVICE, sock->bind_dev,
> > strlen (sock->bind_dev) + 1);
> > + }
> > +#endif
>
> Here, we *must* have a return code check, and logging of an error message
> if setsocktopt() fails.
>
> Imagine someone calling "openvpn --bind-dev eht0" (because he has fat
> fingers). The current code will silently fail the setsockopt() - because
> there is no such interface name - but nothing in the logs will show a hint
> *why* openvpn is just not doing what requested.
I'll look into that and add a patch for that.
Best
Max
--
"I have to admit I've always suspected that MTBWTF would be a more useful
metric of real-world performance."
-- Valdis Kletnieks on NANOG
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
