Hi Antonio, I think I need to test another platform. It may give us more information. I will choose one arm board to have a try when I'm free.
Tony Antonio Quartulli <a...@unstable.cc> 于2024年1月30日周二 19:02写道： > > Hi, > > On 29/01/2024 05:25, Tony He wrote: > > Hi Antonio, > > > > I'm using ovpn-dco which is backported to v4.14 based on your latest > > code. My topology is: > > > > LAN PC -- openwrt router running openvpn server -- WAN PC running openvpn > > client > > Router is with two mips64 cores. > > > > I use the iperf3 to test speed between LAN PC and WAN PC. > > The result is sometime the performance is good(~280Mbps） while > > sometimes is bad(~140Mbps). > > When the performance is bad, one of two CPUs is 100% idle. When the > > performance is good, two CPUs are busy. However， I don't see the issue > > when ipsec is tested in the same test env. Two cores are always used > > for ipsec. So , can ovpn-dco use all cpu cores to get max performance? > > ovpn-dco uses more than core in order to perform different operations, > but more parallelism on traffic processing can definitely be implemented > (patches are welcome ;)). > > Now it's hard to tell if what you are seeing is the result of this > implementation detail or something else, especially because in some > cases you get higher throughput. > > > Cheers, > > -- > Antonio Quartulli _______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
