Hi,

On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 08:02:32PM +0000, Goofy wrote:
> I think it will be fine to have multiple core support.
> I belive it is beneficial when you reboot your Server and
> more than 200 VPN connections will be re-connected ?

Indeed, it would be great.

> And all new Hardware have multi core support why should openvpn not use this 
> ? 

"Nobody did the code yet".

This is a complex problem.  You need a programmer that understands 
parallel processes or threads, network, security, and is willing to 
spend quite a bit of personal time on it - implementation, code review,
testing.

Pay me for about 6-8 weeks, and I think I can do it...  but in my copious
spare time, I won't even start this, as it's too complex a task.

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de

Attachment: pgpmRV82fMdNh.pgp
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Infragistics Professional
Build stunning WinForms apps today!
Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. 
Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-users mailing list
Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users

Reply via email to