Hi, On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:08:16AM -0500, Selva Nair wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 6:51 AM, Gert Doering <[email protected]> wrote: > > > We had vetos on this in the past (because we want to go for the iService), > > but for 2.3, I would welcome such a change - it will not get the iService > > functionality (too intrusive on the OpenVPn side), so the counterargument > > is somewhat moot. > > I suppose, both of these comments refer to running openvpn.exe as admin > by default. > > The test I posted was of requiring admin for the GUI itself (IMO, a bad > idea). > I just assumed requiring admin for openvpn.exe (though a better idea) would > be vetoed at multiple levels.
Actually this is what people do today (set the shortcut to the gui to
"[X] run as admin") to work around the permission issues.
Never thought of doing this for openvpn.exe, though. But then, I won't
claim to understand the intricacies of windows permission control and
UAC.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
