But Aresh is right. So as we have to fulfil the spec (which really requires "beans.xml" now) and also like to be applicable for a lot of situations, we may add a kind of OpenWebBeansConfiguration class which reads this name (and maybe a few other settings in the future) form an openwebbeans.properties from the classpath.
LieGrue, strub --- Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com> schrieb am Sa, 24.1.2009: > Von: Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com> > Betreff: Re: [jira] Created: (OWB-62) Refactor web-beans.xml to beans.xml > An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > Datum: Samstag, 24. Januar 2009, 13:56 > Hi Arash; > > We will just apply the specification requirements. > > Thanks; > > /Gurkan > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Arash Rajaeeyan <arash.rajaee...@gmail.com> > To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 9:28:03 PM > Subject: Re: [jira] Created: (OWB-62) Refactor > web-beans.xml to beans.xml > > Doesn't this make conflict with Spring bean.xml ? > it looks like it is in Spring roadmap to become a light > weight EJB 3.1 > container, > it may be possible in future that both web-beans and spring > containers are > allowed together. > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Mark Struberg (JIRA) > <j...@apache.org>wrote: > > > Refactor web-beans.xml to beans.xml > > ----------------------------------- > > > > Key: OWB-62 > > URL: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-62 > > Project: OpenWebBeans > > Issue Type: Bug > > Reporter: Mark Struberg > > Assignee: Gurkan Erdogdu > > > > > > The term "WebBeans" has completely removed > from the final PR spec and also > > the xml config files name has changed. > > > > -- > > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > > - > > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the > issue online. > > > > > > > -- > Arash Rajaeeyan
