mvn jetty:run-exploded fixes that. I guess that's JSF's problem (I am currently using the RI)
Oh boy! :) On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Matthias Wessendorf<mat...@apache.org> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Mark Struberg<strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: >> In fact we (OWB) should provide standard context implementations for JSF >> annotated scopes. >> >> The whole picture: >> >> .) JSF scanns the classpath for JSF annotations >> >> .) OWB scanns the classpath for JSR-299 annotations >> >> In fact, I assume (not having looked at the code) that MyFaces provides kind >> of a mini DI container in the EL code. So any EL which will get through to >> the faces EL handler will successfully resolve those scoped beans >> >> Otoh, OWB also provides an EL handler which is dominant (prior in the EL >> chain). OWB currently simply ignores the javax.faces.scope annotations since >> they are 'unknown' for OWB. So this very class will look like a bean which >> has no annotations at all. >> >> >> The problem arises latest if JSF scoped beans need to be injected into >> JSR-299 beans and vice versa... >> >> an idea how to resolve this: >> We need to provide context implementations for the faces scopes in the >> webbeans-jsf module and let OWB do all the resolving. >> >> wdyt? > > yes, that's true. It is really a PITA to have three different ways to > @inject stuff (in JavaEE - well the javax.faces.bean.** stuff is > optional) > > I am pretty sure this will actually cause lot's of pain, trouble and > bad blogs on JavaEE 6 (heck, deserved! :-) ) > > Are you able to bring this dilemma up on some EG ? > (mismatch of all the stuff) > > -Matthias > >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> --- On Wed, 8/26/09, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> From: Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> >>> Subject: Re: WebBeans "eating" JSF 2.0 annotations ? >>> To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org >>> Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 5:26 PM >>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:23 PM, >>> Matthias Wessendorf<mat...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Mark Struberg<strub...@yahoo.de> >>> wrote: >>> >> for what I know (discussion on wb-dev) JSF apps >>> should use JSR-299 @ScopeType annotated scopes (renamed to >>> @NormalScope in the latest spec) and not faces scopes. I did >>> hope that we could unify all scopes by generally using >>> JSR-330 javax.inject.Scope in all EE fields. But that will >>> not work until JSR-299 also recognizes and treats JSR-330 >>> scopes as normal scopes. >>> >> >>> > >>> > WTF ? :) >>> > >>> > It is kinda odd that JSF 2.0 has should use the 299 >>> stuff. Standalone, >>> > ok all fine (not tested). >>> > But even if there are both in the game jsf2.0 and 299, >>> they should >>> > just work (or at least I should >>> > get a warning that the bean is using a (good) -sorry- >>> incorrect... annotation. >>> > >>> > Basically this is a total mess. Annontations work >>> standalone, but not >>> > when adding some heavyweight >>> > stuff (like 299) to the game ? Oh boy... >>> >>> I am pretty sure that this will introcude a lot of fun to >>> folks >>> writing JSF 2.0 applications, >>> if your statement is true. That would worse than the JSP >>> 2.1 >>> dependency (with JSF 1.2) >>> >>> I filed this bug: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-133 >>> >>> At least there should be some help. Not everybody is >>> thrilled to >>> replace annotations based on >>> the environment (at least not me) >>> >>> > >>> > -Matthias >>> > >>> >> LieGrue, >>> >> strub >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> --- On Wed, 8/26/09, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> From: Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> >>> >>> Subject: Re: WebBeans "eating" JSF 2.0 >>> annotations ? >>> >>> To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org >>> >>> Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 5:11 PM >>> >>> has no effect. The beast can't find >>> >>> the JSF beans. >>> >>> Due to lack of time, I am going with JSF 2.0 >>> standalone. >>> >>> >>> >>> Question is: as it was working the current >>> behavior is a >>> >>> regression, >>> >>> has there been any testing on OBW + JSF 2.0 ? >>> >>> >>> >>> -Matthias >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Gurkan >>> Erdogdu<cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com> >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > It must not eat. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > But one point, >>> >>> > >>> >>> > You still use old XML configuration file >>> format. As a >>> >>> default OWB uses new >>> >>> > XML format. Add >>> >>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/trunk/samples/guess/src/main/resources/META-INF/openwebbeans/openwebbeans.properties >>> >>> > >>> >>> > in your project >>> resources/META-INF/openwebbeans folder >>> >>> and sure that all >>> >>> > libraries are ok. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > You can look necessary libs from >>> guess.war . You can >>> >>> create it from mvn >>> >>> > package -Pjetty. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > --Gurkan >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > 2009/8/26 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> >>> >>> > >>> >>> >> Hi, >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> is it possible that the current trunk >>> is _eating_ >>> >>> JSF 2.0 annotations ? >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> <someCode> >>> >>> >> ... >>> >>> >> import javax.faces.bean.ManagedBean; >>> >>> >> import >>> javax.faces.bean.SessionScoped; >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> @ManagedBean(name="playersBean") >>> >>> >> @SessionScoped >>> >>> >> public class ViewParamsBean >>> >>> >> { >>> >>> >> ... >>> >>> >> </someCode> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> In June (before reflecting the >>> >>> javax.enterprise.context changes) it was >>> >>> >> working. >>> >>> >> Now expressions like #{playersBean} >>> are simply >>> >>> ignored ;-) >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Demo project is here: >>> >>> >> https://facesgoodies.googlecode.com/svn/CGN/trunk/ >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> -Matthias >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> -- >>> >>> >> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> >>> >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> >>> >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >>> >> >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > -- >>> >>> > Gurkan Erdogdu >>> >>> > http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com >>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Matthias Wessendorf >>> > >>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
