On 10/17/06, Chris Miner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No really, the break was called.
>
> Am Montag, 16. Oktober 2006 17:04 schrieb John Mettraux:
> > On 10/16/06, John Mettraux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 10/16/06, Chris Miner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Okay, nevermind.  I noticed the mistake in my test expression.  I
> > > > haven't closed it with a "}".  This apparently causes the test to
> > > > evaluate to true.
> > >
> > > Indeed, the non-empty string for test= evaluates to true.
> >
> > I'm wrong : the non-empty string being not equal to "true", it's false
> > and your <break/> is not called.
> >
> > I don't feel it's a bug.
> > I agree that some kind of warning should be emitted. I'll think about it.

Hi Chris,

"${field:action != proceed" is evaluated as  ( !
"${field:action".equals("proceed"))


Best regards,

-- 
John Mettraux   -///-   http://jmettraux.openwfe.org

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OpenWFE users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/openwfe-users
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to