Hi Gregory,
On 1/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Considering that I have a couple of existing Agent implementations and
some time constraints, could anyone confirm this would be a correct way
of reusing them ?
engine.registerParticipant(new
AbstractEmbeddedParticipant("my-agent") {
public void consume(WorkItem wi) throws Exception {
final Agent agent = agentBuilder.build("my-agent",
MyAgent.class.getName(), engine.getContext(), Collections.emptyMap());
final InFlowWorkItem agentResult =
agent.use((InFlowWorkItem) wi);
engine.reply(agentResult);
}
});
I would directly paste the agent's code within the consume method of
the embedded participant, it makes things way easier, less code.
Is there any side-effect (wanted or unwanted) in using the same name
for the participant and the agent ?
Forget the agent, you've got an embedded participant now.
How about the __agent_result__ ? I guess I'd need to implement its
handling if needed in the consume method of my participant ?
If your process definition uses the value of that field, then make
sure it's set in the embedded participant. You could maybe go for a
new field name if that makes things clearer. Don't be afraid to get
into control and wipe away old cruft.
Best regards,
--
John Mettraux -///- http://jmettraux.openwfe.org
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenWFE
users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/openwfe-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
