Hi JP,

On 6/5/06, JP Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sorry should have sent users list.

Indeed :-)


> JP Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 23:12:47 -0700 (PDT)
>
> From: JP Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [OpenWFE-devel] Fwd: workflow PDL help needed
>
>  Hi John,
>
>  Thanks a lot.
>
>  I have used cursor. My problem is like this: ( I will be very specific)
>
>  1. When the control passes to final round sub process and Reviewer2 decides
> to send back directly to designer. Now what I want here a readonly copy
> should be sent to Reviewer1 only for information. No action required from
> Reviewer1.
>
>  I want something like that.
>
>  if sentdgn== true
>  then :
>
>  <sequence>
>  < concurrence without any merge without any action>
>
>  < reviewer1 read only copy>
>  <designer read write copy>
>
>  <subprocess ref="docflow"> now control goes to doc flow main flow.
>
>  </concurrence>
>  </sequence>
>
>  So question comes is it possible that in concurrence there will be no
> action no merging nothing. Just I want to use concurrence for sending a
> carbon copy which will be there in Reviewer1's store permanently.
>
>  Or is there any alternate startegy so that I can send workitem to designer
> and a copy to reviewer1 ( read only). But effective participant is designer
> .....reviewer1 can only view it ( He does not have any control) now after
> woritem is with designer the control moves back to main workflow definition.

You should have a look at the synchronization mechanisms of the concurrence :
http://www.openwfe.org/docbook/build/ch07s03.html

It's possible to tell that a branch may get "forgotten".


Or if you want to be very specific, you can do

<participant ref="readonly" forget="true" />
   or
<subprocess ref="readonly" forget="true" />

It should be documented at :
http://www.openwfe.org/docbook/build/ch06s02.html#id2516153
   and
http://www.openwfe.org/docbook/build/ch06s02.html#expression_subprocess

Thus, the reply of the participant or the subprocess will simply get
discarded by the engine.


I hope this will help.


Best regards,

-- 
John Mettraux   -///-   http://jmettraux.openwfe.org


_______________________________________________
OpenWFE - Open source WorkFlow Engine
OpenWFE-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openwfe-users

Reply via email to