On 10/2/07, Pat Cappelaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Should we really care about the next guy ?
> > Isn't it more appropriate to think about services struggling to
> > transform their input into something usable ?
> > Let's fight on 1 front.
>
> My workflows are really for external web services orchestration so this is
> quite critical for my application. Front 1 and 2 are actually similar (see
> next)
>
> (...)
> >
> > Within the engine, workitems are just plain ruby instances, the
> > 'attributes' is a hash. Would this generic XsltParticipant imply that
> > all workitems are transferred as XML between participants (even
> > between expressions) ?
>
> Yes. The web services I deal with usually return XML. I just store the
> results as is in the workitem. So the problem becomes an XSLT transform.
An XsltParticipant could be fine.
engine.register :transformation_1,
XsltParticipant.new("http://wherever.net/trans1.xslt";)
something like that ?
--
John Mettraux -///- http://jmettraux.openwfe.org
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"OpenWFEru dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
