On Nov 12, 2007 9:15 AM, John Mettraux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 12, 2007 5:11 PM, Tomaso Tosolini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > Meanwhile if someone has a suggestion for replacing the __result__ > > > field name, that deserves some discussion. It comes from back in 2002 > > > when my only scripting language was python. > > > > Do you mean remove the concept of result field and introcuce something > > other? > > Hello, > > no the concept is OK, but maybe someone has a better name than > "__result__" or a better syntax. It might be a good time to change > this name. Of course we can go on with it, it's used a lot, but just > behind the scene.
Ok now i understand: what about leaving "__result__" as default value ( it's clear enough) but allowing users to change this value with some library config value? T > > > > Best regards, > > -- > John Mettraux -///- http://jmettraux.openwfe.org > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenWFEru dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
