John, OpenWFE -> BPMN is interesting but if you cannot round-trip it, you may as well just support those upcoming tools (via WfXML :) But I do like it... I just think that if a tool is used (which is likely), then the workflow definition resource would point to a link to the graphical version as generated by the tool.
Pat. > From: John Mettraux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:14:32 +0900 > To: <[email protected]>, Pat Cappelaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [openwferu-dev] Re: BizAgi > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Pat Cappelaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> The point being is that more and more free tools are coming out. > > True. > > >> They use BPMN 1.0 as standard notation and serialize the output to XPDL. >> This is why that WfXML interface is fairly important to support. >> I would like to leverage those tools and still use OpenWFE. >> Once I have the API done, I would like to add the XPDL->OpenWfe translator >> (unless you beat me to it:) > > OK, I will probably not beat you at that, on that front I'm rather > working on OpenWFE -> BPMN. > > I've been thinking about including an expression that makes it easier > to have "graph oriented" stuff in OpenWFE, that could save you time > for XPDL -> OpenWFE. > > >> BTW, made some progress over the weekend. I am developing RSPEC user >> stories to test my changes :) > > That's very cool. > > > Best regards, > > -- > John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenWFEru dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
