On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 4:58 PM, John Mettraux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Tomaso Tosolini
>
>  > My idea was that such working mecha should keep the exec tree quite
>  > flat, or if not, at least his deepness is due only to the process 
> definition
>  > schema, not to the workitem process execution "real path".
>
>  It would be a good exercise to implement your suggestions (maybe a
>  fork of Ruote).
>
>  One technique to avoid such fat stacks would be to use "tail
>  recursion" ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tail_recursion ), it's not
>  implemented in Ruote to keep things simple (and it's not implemented
>  in Ruby itself neither (though I don't know for 1.9 / yarv)).

Hello Tomaso,

I've tried (in a branch) to implement some tailish improvement :
http://github.com/jmettraux/ruote/commit/aa45f4935f5d69199cf9a7e683a4d455f4d1e5de

5% faster it seems. Thinking about merging that in the master branch.
Maybe you have other suggestions.


Back to your idea :

> My idea about the state-transition working mode was to build things such
> that the "goto"  expressions, insead of transferring the control to the next
> state using the apply method, call the state-transition's reply method and
> then the dispatch to the next state was performed by the state-transition
> calling the appy method of the designed next state, but in this case we are
> doing this at the state-transition context, now within the current state's
> context.

I have this impression, that the <step> expression does just that.
Maybe your scenario relies on a case where a "state" is used once and
only once.


Thanks for the feedback so far, cheers,

-- 
John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OpenWFEru dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to