On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Danny<[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm thinking of using ruote in a consumer website. How well does ruote > scale? Are there real world examples from higher traffic websites?
Hi Danny, sorry for the late reply. The current ruote is a bit weak with respect to classical ruby "scaling techniques". The new ruote 2.0 [1] will fare better. The main issue is about the time scheduler inside of ruote, its current implementation thinks it's alone so having multiple instances of an engine becomes painful. The current technique is to use ruote-rest on the back seat. That's how [2] is doing it. The front web site makes GET/POST[/PUT/DELETE] calls on a unique workflow server (ruote-rest) behind the scenes. Note that the next version of ruote-rest, named ruote-kit is in the making [3]. If you have further questions, please use the users mailing list [4], I will close this "dev" mailing list soon. Thanks for your interest and best regards, [1] http://github.com/jmettraux/ruote/tree/ruote2.0 [2] http://www.ispinabox.co.za [3] http://github.com/kennethkalmer/ruote-kit/ [4] http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users -- John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenWFEru dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
