On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Corin Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there any major side-effect to having a configurable wait for in the > post "/processes" block? Or should there perhaps be a blocking engine > implementation?
Hello Corin, sorry for the late reply. You mean something like this : http://github.com/jmettraux/ruote-rest/tree/wait_for/lib/res/processes.rb#L52-65 ? I think there should be no major problem. Things to watch : - you have to manage client timeout - the process could terminate right before wait_for is called (wait_for would wait indefinitely) - wait_for will not reply in case of error in the process I'll probably have to refine the wait_for method in the engine itself (adding a timeout and stopping the wait in case of exception). I'd be happy to help you with this use case. I'm looking forward to general feedback on ruote-rest as well. Your prototyping approach looks very interesting. Best regards, -- John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenWFEru users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
