On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Kenneth Kalmer<[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:29 AM, John Mettraux <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'd suggest you focus on this ruote 2.0 for ruote-kit. Wdyt ? > > Looking forward to it! My last roadblocks on daemon-kit is out the way so > I'll start within the next day or two. I'll announce the repo here as soon > as it's on github as well. Will probably be a rough first week or two.
Hi Kenneth, take your time, so I can have some "advance". > I know we discussed this in #ruote, but let me know when the external > participants in ruota is ready so I can extract the Nanite, XMPP and AMQP > participant/listener pairs into seperate gems, helping to keep the core nice > and simple. > > Just thinking out aloud, shouldn't the DB/TC persistence also be seperate > gems? Bringing back the discussion on that, wouldn't it be OK to simply have Nanite / XMPP / DB / TC in the core and simply "force" the user to require them (they'll require their deps) if he needs them ? Trying to avoid gem proliferation... Maybe I'm wrong. Cheers, -- John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
