Hi John,

on points 3 and 4, I find in my work (with small-medium sized
companies) nobody cares. So in my experience, no BPEL, XPDL, BPMN,
Visio  etc. is even mentioned, so no problem. I suspect this is
different for larger companies.

Regards,

Peter

On Jun 24, 3:47 am, John Mettraux <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Peter Dalmaris<[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>
> > However, I am not convinced yet that Ruote is the way to go. I would
> > be very interested to hear relevant stories from the members of this
> > group. Descriptions of production applications build with Ruote,
> > successes and failures, arguments for or against this solution, words
> > of wisdom etc.
>
> > I suppose any responses could be compiled into a Ruote "showcase".
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> thanks for your interest in ruote.
>
> You seem to need to build a dossier for your ruote pre-sales.
>
> A few links at first :
>
>  http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users/browse_frm/thread/faef...
>  http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-dev/browse_frm/thread/faef1a...
>
> This census was done 6 months ago. Since then at least two
> organizations have started using ruote.
>
> Since I'm the founder of the project, let me draft a non-exhaustive
> list of its bad points (exaggerations included) :
>
> 1) it's a project, not a product
> 2) it's not adapted to the average ruby developer who truncate
> workflow to "let's use a state machine"
> 3) your boss will hate it, it's not "standard" (no BPEL, no XPDL)
> 4) the domain experts will hate it, it doesn't [yet] import their visio 
> diagrams
> 5) it's hard to scale (that's changing, but the initial 1 organization
> wf engine use case is still present)
> 6) you can't buy support
> 7) you will have to acquire support anyway (be part of the community)
> 8) it's moving from 0.9 to 2.0
> (http://github.com/jmettraux/ruote/tree/ruote2.0) that means
> ruote-web2 will be upgrade to ruote2.0 very soon
> 9) there is more documentation than the average project, but it's
> never the right one
> 10) there is no showcase and it's hard to get someone to compile it for free
> 11) it's obscure and weird (maybe only "original")
>
> Now I hope others in the list will pop and add their bad points as well.
>
> If you are not convinced, don't use it.
>
> Best regards,
>
> --
> John Mettraux   -  http://jmettraux.wordpress.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group.
to post : send email to [email protected]
to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected]
more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to