On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Kenneth Kalmer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:25 PM, John Mettraux <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Kenneth Kalmer <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > Like we discussed briefly in #ruote I'll be doing the following this >> > path: >> > >> > 1) Rename RuoteAMQP::Listener to RuoteAMQP::WorkitemListener >> > 2) Introduce RuoteAMQP::LaunchitemListener >> > >> > This makes the various AMQP components totally opt-in and leaner, and >> > like >> > you said "it feels right". >> >> +1 >> >> Sounds great ! > > Pushed to my ruote2.0 branch at http://github.com/kennethkalmer/ruote-amqp > > Looking forward to any feedback. > > Next move, changing the namespace to Ruote::AMQP and giving the docs an > overhaul.
Hello Kenneth, looks excellent ! Glad to see the specs back in line ! I was thinking what about about Listener and LaunchitemListener instead of WorkitemListener and LaunchitemListener, it would simplify transition from 0.9 to 2.0... Well be the judge. It's true that WorkitemListener conveys more sense than simply Listener. Less confusion. OK, WorkitemListener and LaunchitemListener is the way to go ! +1 for Ruote::AMQP Many thanks ! -- John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
