Thanks! I was initially trying to get that ruote-amqp branch to work with the newest version of ruote, but I didn't understand enough about the new version to get it working. I'll post any followups with testing in the other thread.
-d On Jan 26, 2:42 am, Kenneth Kalmer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:34 AM, John Mettraux <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Dave @ UPENN <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > Am I missing something or was the remote participant / listener pair > > > completely scrapped? I have a nice app that works with ruote 0.9 / > > > ruote-amqp to pick messages off a queue and process jobs. It was > > > giving me trouble with concurrent process definitions so i decided to > > > upgrade to ruote 2.1.x. How do I implement remote participants with > > > 2.1.x? > > > Hi Dave, > > > it seems you are equating remote participant / listener pair with > > ruote-amqp. > > > We haven't yet upgraded ruote-amqp to 2.1, though Kenneth has a 2.0 branch > > : > > > http://github.com/kennethkalmer/ruote-amqp/tree/ruote2.0 > > > Maybe you can help (at least help testing). > > > We will try and bootstrap that, ruote-amqp is very important. > > Hi Dave > > I'll get cracking on this, I realize ruote-amqp is very important to our > users (and myself as well). Please watch the repo, I'll be pushing a > ruote2.1 branch up to github and making it the default. > > As you test, please give us rapid feedback so we can address any issues. I > won't be taking this code into production just yet, my upgrade from 0.9 to > 2.1 is scheduled for late Feb/early March. > > Thanks for the prod :) > > -- > Kenneth Kalmer > [email protected]http://opensourcery.co.za > @kennethkalmer -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
