Am Montag, den 12.07.2010, 16:58 +0900 schrieb John Mettraux: > 2010/7/12 Torsten Schönebaum <[email protected]>: > > John wrote: > > > > [about configuration in RuoteKit] > > > >> All is good, but IMO, ruote's configuration is sufficiently easy and > >> convenient not to be hidden. > >> > >> RuoteKit.engine = Ruote::Engine.new( > >> Ruote::Worker.new( > >> Ruote::FsStorage.new('ruote_work'))) > >> RuoteKit.engine.register do > >> participant "alpha", MyAlphaParticipant, :flavour => 'vanilla' > >> catchall > >> end > >> > >> The convention here is that the engine is located in the RuoteKit.engine > >> 'singleton'. > >> > >> The trick here is that I will port the register block configuration > >> from ruote-kit to ruote. > >> > >> Comments ? > > > > In my opinion, this is a great idea. I would suggest a default fallback > > if the user forgets to set RuoteKit.engine, though. > > for now, I was thinking about "letting it break fast".
Having thought about that, I believe you're right, even without the quotation marks ;-) Voting for a nice exception message now. Yours, Torsten -- you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
