El 29/07/2010 11:25, John Mettraux escribió:
Asier,
I've been toying with : ( http://gist.github.com/497698 )
---8<---
require 'ruote'
pdef = Ruote.define do
sequence do
participant 'alpha'
participant 'bravo'
concurrence do
participant 'alpha'
participant 'bravo'
end
participant 'charly'
end
end
[ ... ]
where "charly" is the last participant.
But what about cases where :
[ ... ]
Where the alpha, bravo and co could be subprocess names...
Oh, I get the point. You're right; in simple workflows it's easy to know who's
the last participant, but in not-so-compex ones could be tricky.
I think it's better to model this batch tasks (in my case) with remote
participants; looks a better solution and it's more visible what should happen
in a process if you see that tasks modeled as participants.
Regards
--
you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group.
to post : send email to [email protected]
to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected]
more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
