The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.
--- Begin Message ---This gives each port an individual link to the CPU. The advantage of this is that it can now route packets faster between the ports (before the CPU only had a single 1Gb link to the switch that has to be shared between both ports. Another advantage is that in Linux 5.10 you can now bridge a VLAN to a non-vlan port. Without this patch, you're not getting any data across the bridge. That is fixed in Linux 5.15 but is still handled by the CPU in any case. So therefore this patch is advantageous in all cases except for when you need the device as a simple switch without VLANs. For that case it's better to revert this and the switch hardware will forward traffic without bothering the CPU. Signed-off-by: Harm Berntsen <g...@harmberntsen.nl> --- .../ramips/dts/mt7621_arcadyan_we420223-99.dts | 16 ++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7621_arcadyan_we420223-99.dts b/target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7621_arcadyan_we420223-99.dts index f68d79af15..88e823e382 100644 --- a/target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7621_arcadyan_we420223-99.dts +++ b/target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7621_arcadyan_we420223-99.dts @@ -188,16 +188,24 @@ &switch0 { ports { - port@0 { - status = "okay"; - }; - port@1 { status = "okay"; }; }; }; +&gmac1 { + status = "okay"; + label = "lan0"; + phy-handle = <ðphy0>; +}; + +&mdio { + ethphy0: ethernet-phy@0 { + reg = <0>; + }; +}; + &pcie { status = "okay"; }; -- 2.37.2
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel