Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote: > On gio, 2008-07-03 at 12:59 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: >> On Thursday 03 July 2008 11:01:17 Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> >>> I know that what I say usually is ignored :D But I like to flood this ml >>> with stupid(?) ideas. >>> >>> The actual OpenWRT considers kernels 2.6.X.Y and 2.6.X.(Y+1) as a very >>> different kernels downloading the full sources for both. I think that >>> this is not a good approach because this is time and band expensive. >>> >>> An idea should be to download the full sources 2.6.X kernels and just >>> the patches 2.6.X.1, 2.6.X.2, ... 2.6.X.Y to cover the kernels with >>> version like 2.6.X.Y. The result will be a gain in terms of band and >>> time utilization. >>> >>> I think that to achieve this the download perl and make scripts should >>> be made more smart than actual versions >>> >>> These optimizations should be applied also to gcc and uclibc and any >>> other package that provides diff between versions. >>> >>> Thanks a lot for your comments. >> >> -ENOPATCH ? >> >> > > I don't understand. What do you mean?
He thinks it's a good idea and likes to see a patch :) - Jan _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
