I second that. Best regards.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Layne Edwards <ledwa...@astrumtech.net>wrote: > On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 19:31:41 +0200, Gregers Petersen wrote: > > Dear all > > I promised to post an agenda for the patch process meeting sunday on irc > -devel @ 19:00 UTC. > > The generel discussion has concerned two central points. first, how is > the patch submission process in reality working? Secondly, in what way > > does an individual become an OpenWrt developer? > > Patch submission; several individuals have voiced the issue that patches > submitted to the mailing-list, or in Trac, have been un-acknowledged. > There has been no reply from any of the current developers, and the > > submitter wonders what is wrong (is the patch itself flawed, is the > patch-process not working etc.) > Becoming a developer; is a topic of concern. The general position of the > OpenWrt developers is the well-known: Do good work and you will gain > > access right to the repository/Trac. > > Agenda: > > 1. Patch process: > - is the current patch process understandable? > - what other ways of doing things are available? > - is better documentation needed? > > - OpenWrt ombudsmand? > > 2. Developer: > - how to better the inclusion of new committers? > - mentor-system? > > 3. Other things? > > Unfortunately I was unable to attend. Can someone post a summary please? > > Thanks, > Layne > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > >
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
