-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/26/2011 12:54 AM, Hendrik Bartusch wrote: > Hi, > > I thought you were keeping your own repository at > git://projects.qi-hardware.com/openwrt-xburst.git ? I had several > difficulties porting packages to my own NanoNote, since your repo is not
if you are porting packages to nanonote. I would advice using this SDK: http://downloads.qi-hardware.com/software/images/NanoNote/Ben/latest/OpenWrt-SDK-xburst-for-Linux-x86_64-gcc-4.3.3+cs_uClibc-0.9.30.1.tar.bz2 (I am using that for porting package) > in sync with OpenWRT. Some of your packages are really cool, but > unfortunately the rest of the repo was always a bit old. Some time ago i > was trying to patch some kernel changes i needed into my Nano but > actually I gave up, because it was too much work resolving all those > version conflicts between the OpenWRT and the Nano repositories. yes. the openwrt-xburst.git is tracking 'backfire' branch of upstream > > Are you going to merge the Nano branch back? there are a 'trunk' branch in openwrt-xburst.git now. this branch is for merge our source code to upstream master branch. we have start a little check here: http://en.qi-hardware.com/wiki/Git#openwrt-xburst.git_rebase_on_upstream_trunk there are 28 patches we needs merge to 'trunk' branch. then we can send patches again to mailing list :) we will working on that this week. > > Refering to your question about what to test: OpenWRT Packages are > generally expected to compile & run on every supported target, except > for those which are really hardware specific. So I think it's a good > idea to use some VMs for generic x86, mips and arm targets and to > compile & test your packages for these targets. It's always a > disappointment for OpenWRT users, if you find a package you're > interested in in the repository, and then to find out later, they won't > run, or won't even compile for your target. thanks for the answer. I think there is a build host in openwrt. can we using that? > > Am Montag, den 25.04.2011, 23:15 +0800 schrieb Xiangfu Liu: > On 04/22/2011 08:00 PM, Travis Kemen wrote: >>>> If you want to maintain packages in packages/ please send me an email with >>>> what packages you would like to maintain. > Hi Travis > > thanks for reply. I want to participate maintain the ben nanonote target :) > I am not interesting in particular package, I am more interesting in what > should I test > before I send out the package 'makefile' > >> [...] > >>>> >>>> Travis >>>> >>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Xiangfu Liu <xiangf...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi >>>> what should I do for apply the openwrt committer? >>>> maybe more special, one of ben nanonote maintainer? >>>> >>>> what should we test before we send package makefile to upstream? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk22JncACgkQRRAEFRxkgLSdQACePUuzUnZZ2Fw9WOAp1yrltHjC 1fUAn1/ofMU5LBjTJYecoD8C1WH2g7Bc =WReY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
