2011/8/29 <edgar.sol...@web.de> > On 29.08.2011 17:14, Jonas Gorski wrote: > > On 29 August 2011 17:04, <edgar.sol...@web.de> wrote: > >> On 29.08.2011 16:44, Jan Willies wrote: > >>> 2011/8/29 <edgar.sol...@web.de <mailto:edgar.sol...@web.de>> > >>> > >>> On 29.08.2011 16 <tel:29.08.2011%2016>:14, Jan Willies wrote: > >>> > Hi Luka, > >>> > > >>> > 2011/8/21 Luka Perkov <open...@lukaperkov.net <mailto: > open...@lukaperkov.net> <mailto:open...@lukaperkov.net <mailto: > open...@lukaperkov.net>>> > >>> > > >>> > define Package/openvpn > >>> > SECTION:=net > >>> > CATEGORY:=Network > >>> > + SUBMENU:=VPN > >>> > DEPENDS:=+kmod-tun +libopenssl > +PACKAGE_openvpn_complzo:liblzo > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > The lzo dependency doesn't seem to work. It's not selected here. > >>> > >>> as openvpn_complzo obviously is a package definition why isn't the > liblzo dependency defined there? that would definitely select it then. > >>> > >>> > >>> It's just a configuration option (Config.in), not a full featured > package. Depending on it there makes it unavailable in menuconfig unless lzo > is selected. This is not desired IMO. > >>> > >>> > >> > >> i see, but there is only a OPENVPN_LZO there in Config.in . So wouldn't > it be > >> > >> +OPENVPN_LZO:liblzo > > > > OPENVPN_LZO /disables/ lzo, so it should be: > > > > +!OPENVPN_LZO:liblzo > > > > > > which incidentially shows that the option names are misleading and > > they should be renamed or their effect reversed, so that they enable, > > not disable (I'd prefer the latter). > > > > > > right missed that. and yes reversing would be most elegant. ede >
fixed in r28120
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
