On 08/30/2011 06:57 AM, Mark Deneen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:34 AM, LEO Airwarosu Yoichi Shinoda
<shin...@jaist.ac.jp> wrote:
On 2011/08/30, at 6:13, Peter Naulls wrote:
I have an immediate need to support v1 and v2 hardware in one image. As
"products" they are essentially identical, as well as in user space in
Linux,
and deploying a image which is all but identical to support 2 machines makes
no sense to me.
Are you sure that WZR-HP-G300NH/NH1 and WZR-HP-G300NH2 are
(essentially) identical?
Here are brief description of chip sets used in WZR-HP*.
WZR-HP-G300NH1 AR9132 + AR9100 + RTL8366*
(WZR-HP-G300NH, WZR-HP-G301NH(JP market), WZR-HP-G302NH(JP market))
WZR-HP-G300NH2 AR7242 + AR9280 + AR8316
and just FYI,
WHR-HP-G300N AR7240 + AR9280 + AR8316
WZR-HP-AG300H AR7161 + AR9220 + AR9223 + AR8316
I believe that he is saying that Buffalo markets and sells the
WZR-HP-G300NH2 as the WZR-HP-G300NH. That is, the boxes are identical
and you don't know what you have until you open it.
They are clearly different SoCs and different peripherals, but they
are the same size RAM and flash, same exterior and connectors, and
the kernel that runs on them by default is identical - differing only in
the parameter passed. As for the 300/301, they differ only in
network chip, and that support was merged a few weeks ago.
The AG300H is different enough in specs that you could argue
a different kernel, or perhaps not. If we end up using that
hardware later for our product, I'll be looking at merging that
too, but we'll see.
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
