On 03/02/2012 06:01 AM, Nathan Hintz wrote: > The SPROM is initialized in bcm47xx_fill_sprom, so move the call to > bcm47xx_fill_sprom_ethernet after it. > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Hintz <nlhi...@hotmail.com> > > Index: > target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-3.2/199-MIPS-BCM47XX-provide-sprom-to-bcma-bus.patch > =================================================================== > --- > target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-3.2/199-MIPS-BCM47XX-provide-sprom-to-bcma-bus.patch > (revision 30770) > +++ > target/linux/brcm47xx/patches-3.2/199-MIPS-BCM47XX-provide-sprom-to-bcma-bus.patch > (working copy) > @@ -66,13 +66,13 @@ > + bcm47xx_fill_sprom(out, prefix); > + return 0; > + } else if (bus->hosttype == BCMA_HOSTTYPE_SOC) { > -+ bcm47xx_fill_sprom_ethernet(out, NULL); > + core = bcma_find_core(bus, BCMA_CORE_80211); > + if (core) { > + snprintf(prefix, sizeof(prefix), "sb/%u/", > + core->core_index); > + bcm47xx_fill_sprom(out, prefix); > + } > ++ bcm47xx_fill_sprom_ethernet(out, NULL); > + return 0; > + } else { > + printk(KERN_WARNING "bcm47xx: unable to fill SPROM for given > bustype.\n");
Why do you want to move this call? If there is a mac address stored with the prefix (sb/1/) for this core we should take it in favor of the general mac address without a prefix. In my device both addresses are the same so it would not make a difference, but I haven't looked into all nvrams. Hauke _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel