both packaes are build in a sepreate folders so yes - you can select both packages.
But you can also building both and testing it ;) /Peter On Monday 19 March 2012 13:24:24 edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: > had a look at irssi. does this actually work when both packages are > selected? don't you end up with two packages both containing whatever was > build first? > > ..ede > > On 19.03.2012 13:18, Peter Wagner wrote: > > Hi, > > > > look at the ctorrent or irssi Makefile. There you can see how to > > implement the nossl stuff in one Makefile. > > > > Regards, > > Peter > > > > On Monday 19 March 2012 12:05:31 Christiane Ruetten wrote: > >> Hi Edgar, > >> > >> just to be explicit: the idea is to have lighttpd-nossl in the > >> > >> official repo so I can get away with distributing a single > >> platform-independent opkg. So I was hoping that the current > >> maintainer could simply add a -nossl build instead of me having > >> to reproduce the complete build effort. > >> > >> What I could do, though, is provide for a package/lighttpd-nossl/ > >> Makefile and company and someone else adds it to the official > >> build system, but chances are that testing my changes, and generally > >> making sure I didn't screw up might surpass the effort that > >> a knowledgable maintainer requires for a copy/modify operation > >> on the current package repo. > >> > >> I might be wrong there, and am grateful for any advice on > >> how to proceed. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Christiane > >> > >> Am 19.03.12 11:30, schrieb edgar.sol...@web.de: > >>> On 19.03.2012 10:52, Christiane Ruetten wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> would you be able to easily add a variant of the lighttpd > >>>> > >>>> package without the massive libopenssl dependency? It is almost > >>>> completely filling up the flash in 4 MByte routers, leaving > >>>> almost no headroom for further functionality, and https is not > >>>> always required. > >>>> > >>>> I am currently in the process of rewriting the PirateBox > >>>> > >>>> wifi deaddrop service in an OpenWRT-friendly way. The current > >>>> target router chosen by the PirateBox community is the > >>>> TL-MR3020 which unfortunately only has 4 MByte flash. > >>>> Installing just lighttpd with rewrite and cgi and minimal > >>>> modules for USB storage takes the system from 1.4M to under > >>>> 100K of free flash. > >>> > >>> hi christiane, > >>> > >>> take a look at the lighttpd makefile > >>> > >>> https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/net/lighttpd/Makefile > >>> > >>> how webdav is build in as selectable package. > >>> > >>> you could do something similar to the currently hard coded openssl > >>> support. > >>> > >>> ..ede > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> openwrt-devel mailing list > >>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > >>> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> openwrt-devel mailing list > >> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > >> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > > openwrt-devel mailing list > > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
