On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 05:47:03PM +0300, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2012-03-29 1:51 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > > On 2012-03-29 11:50 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >> Le 03/28/12 00:49, Otto Solares Cabrera a écrit : > >>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 03:49:04PM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >>>> Hello, > >>>> > >>>> Le 03/27/12 15:43, Otto Solares Cabrera a écrit : > >>>>> Hi! > >>>>> > >>>>> I have a WRT160NL with the 3 interfaces (eth0, eth1, wlan0) on a single > >>>>> bridge (br-lan) and I was normally doing filtering between them but now > >>>>> all the packets are unconditionally bridged to all the interfaces > >>>>> despite the ebtables rules. ebtables doesn't report hits on rules. > >>>>> > >>>>> My last working image was based on r30676 with 3.2.7 kernel, I'm pretty > >>>>> sure is not an upstream kernel problem as I tried latest trunk with > >>>>> kernels 3.2.7, 3.2.12, 3.2.13 and 3.3 and the same problem. > >>>>> > >>>>> Does some default changed recently? > >>>> You might want to revert changeset r30954 and see if that changes > >>>> something for you. > >>> Reverting that changeset fixes my problem, thank you! > >> > >> Felix, do you have any idea why this does not work for Otto? > > I think I need a new sysctl for passing packets through ebtables but not > > iptables. As a workaround you can probably simply set the sysctl field > > net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-arptables to 1. > > I'll make the new sysctl default to =1 as long as ebtables is loaded. > Fix is in, please try the new version.
New version works fine, thank you!! -- Otto _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel