Hi, On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 01:49:18AM +0200, Michael Markstaller wrote: > Appreciate your work really but just my 5ct: noone needs IPv6 if not in > search for troubles or many new (security)-problems.
Welcome to the 21st century.
There are ISPs in Asia today(!) that *will* *not* give you an IPv4 address,
because they have none left.
> I love the --disable-ipv6 switch, please keep it working without this
> experiment, I guess there are many other fields to work on - with more
> relationship to real-life :o
IPv6 is most relevant to real-life.
Many of the problems we see in IPv6 deployments are caused exactly by
this attitude - instead of *using* it and fixing the problems that are
still left, disabling it and hoping that it won't be needed before
personal retirement. This won't get any of the issues fixed, and one
day you'll find yourself in need of IPv6, and the problems are still
there.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
pgpGLg8CjygRJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
