Le 15/02/2014 12:02, Roman Yeryomin a écrit : > On 14 February 2014 20:43, Mikko Hissa <mikko.hi...@werzek.com> wrote: >> >> On 14 Feb 2014, at 01:04, Roman Yeryomin <leroi.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 14 February 2014 00:34, Mikko Hissa <mikko.hi...@werzek.com> wrote: >>>> In rt2800lib.c function rt2800_get_txwi_rxwi_size() >>>> Add case MT7620 with RT5592. >>>> >>>> *txwi_size = TXWI_DESC_SIZE_5WORDS; >>>> *rxwi_size = RXWI_DESC_SIZE_6WORDS; >>>> break; >>>> >>> >>> I suppose you mean RT5390 because: >>> ieee80211 phy0: rt2x00_set_rt: Info - RT chipset 5390, rev 0500 detected >>> >>> Also as far as I understand (from datasheet) it's not the same as >>> RT5592. Correct me if I'm wrong. >>> So I added: >>> >>> case RT5390: >>> *txwi_size = TXWI_DESC_SIZE_5WORDS; >>> *rxwi_size = RXWI_DESC_SIZE_4WORDS; >>> break; >> >> They should be 5 and 6 words not 5 and 4! >> >> *txwi_size = TXWI_DESC_SIZE_5WORDS; >> *rxwi_size = RXWI_DESC_SIZE_6WORDS; >> break; > > You are right, it's 5 and 6 words - I misread the datasheet. Also > seems there is a typo first stating txwi is 4 words but describing 5 > below. > Anyway I tried txwi 5 and rxwi 6 and results are the same. > >> The original driver detects MT7620 by chip id 0x5390 and bus type. The >> driver in rt2x00 for RT5390 is for a another chip. So you might not want to >> run the bits of code meant for RT5390 but create some dummy definition for >> MT7620 and set it in rt2800_probe_rt(). >> > > Ook.. I'll try to separate and clean that.
Any news regarding the MT7620 WiFi? Regards, Michel _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
