2014-03-31 16:39 GMT+02:00 Jonas Gorski <j...@openwrt.org>: > > Hello there. > > > > Have a question. What about those switch chips: > > - ar8316, > > - ar8227, > > - ar7240. > > > > Are they also capable of doing tagged+untagged vlan on the same port at > the > > same time? Do they benefit from this pach? Could anyone with a deeper > > knowledge comment on this topic please? Many thanks in advance. > > It's a bit more complicated. > > ar8216, ar8316: > - do not support mixed traffic at all. Either everything is tagged or > nothing is tagged on a port. > > ar8227/8, ar8236 > - support having the PVID untagged and everything else tagged through > a special port-tag-mode, so here only one vlan untagged at most, and > it always matches the PVID. > > ar8327/8, ar8337/8. > - support per untagging/tagging on a per vlan per port basis on > egress. So here more than one vlan could be untagged on egress, but > the PVID still sets the incoming VID. > > > No idea about ar7240, ar933x, ar934x, ar935x, qca955x, although I > suspect ar7240 will fall into the same category as ar8216, and ar933x > and newer into the ar8227/8 category, maybe the "enterprise" class > ones even like ar8327. >
What about ar8366s? It used to work, but currently it's broken. https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/7795 > > > > Jonas > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
