Hey David, Ive just picked up an AP Outdoor Plus model today, I can help you get it sorted and committed to the tree Once ive gone through the testing and needed validation steps..... Ill keep you all posted.
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:33 AM, David Hutchison <dhutchi...@bluemesh.net> wrote: > It's running well in OpenWRT, I just need some guidance on how to go about > patching the "m25p80.c" file. Nobody responded about the Makefile change, > if it was proper to use the "UAPPRO" profile, since it matches the UniFi+. > > If you manually apply those changes to your tree, it will work. > > -- Davey > > > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 3:20 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com < > valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 2:33 AM, David Hutchison <dhutchi...@bluemesh.net> >> wrote: >> >>> I was able to get the Ubiquiti UniFi Outdoor Plus to boot into OpenWRT >>> today, however I need some assistance writing a patch for it. There >>> are two things that need to happen: >>> >>> First of all, this is how I got it to work: >>> >>> Modify target/linux/ar71xx/image/Makefile: >>> >>> >> --- Makefile.bak 2014-04-04 17:01:40.929134535 -0700 >>> >> >> >>> <snip> >>> >> >> >>> I would like some help testing and creating a valid patch. 1.) I don't >>> know if you need to modify the flash driver in the newer kernel, can >>> someone confirm trunk has support for the en25qh128 flash chip? 2.) >>> Should we use "UAPPRO" since the flash layout seems to be the same on >>> both the PRO and UBNT Outdoor Unifi Plus? Is that a valid approach as >>> far as the Makefile is concerned? 3.) If the flash chip change is not >>> needed in the latest trunk, is the first patch I provided sufficient >>> for Initial UniFi Outdoor Plus support? >>> >>> -- Davey >>> >> >> Has there been any progress? I'm considering getting one UAP-Outdoor+ but >> it is not cheap, so it is not an impulse decision. I would like to help and >> test and get this hardware supported under OpenWrt, if anybody has means to >> send at least two devices for testing I'll work on getting them supported >> under OpenWrt. >> > > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > >
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
