Le jeudi 17 juillet 2014 à 17:03 -0700, David Lang a écrit : > But the reality is that hackers and worms have shown that leaving systems > exposed to the Internet is just a Bad Idea.
Do you mean, all the hackers and worms we see today despite all these systems being behind blocking firewalls and NATs? […] > link-local addressing isn't a good idea, because the average home will have > three separate links (wired plus two bands of wireless), these can get > bridged > together, but that causes problems as well. For this, you have ULA. It is available in OpenWRT and recommanded by the RFCs cited earlier. […] > But do you really want to see the news stories about how anyone running > openwrt > is vulnerable to $lastest_windows_exploit but people running stock firmware > aren't? This is nonsense, this will never happen as nobody cares about OpenWRT. > Yes, it would be ideal if every host was locked down so that it was safe for > them to be exposed. They are exposed anyway, by other means. -- benjamin _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel