What's the motivation for this change?
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Alive <[email protected]> wrote: > X-Patchwork-Id: 6322 > Message-Id: <[email protected]> > > Is there any chance for my proposed patch to be committed? > http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/6322/ > > Here is a brief comparison about binary and package size increase. > Tested on AR9330, mips, TL MR3220v2 > > Before applying sha2-hmac patch > root@OpenWrt:~# du -sh $(which dropbear) > 161.5K /usr/sbin/dropbear > > After applying sha2-hmac patch > root@OpenWrt:~# du -sh $(which dropbear) > 165.5K /usr/sbin/dropbear > > It's about 4K binary size increase. > > debug information > ssh root@OpenWrt -o MACs=hmac-sha2-512,hmac-sha2-256 -v > ... > debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent > debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received > debug1: kex: server->client aes128-ctr hmac-sha2-512 none > debug1: kex: client->server aes128-ctr hmac-sha2-512 none > ... > > Package size compared to downloaded trunk > 84829 Sep 25 02:43 dropbear_2014.65-2_ar71xx.ipk > 81896 Sep 25 02:13 dropbear_2014.65-2_ar71xx.ipk > It's about 3K package size increase. > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
